Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:18936 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 85856 invoked by uid 1010); 14 Sep 2005 21:55:41 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 85841 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2005 21:55:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Sep 2005 21:55:41 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.169.182.136 ajaxatwork.net Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([81.169.182.136:43409] helo=strato.aixcept.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 73/B4-41173-C5C98234 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 17:55:40 -0400 Received: from localhost (strato.aixcept.de [81.169.182.136]) by strato.aixcept.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4C335C36E; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 00:18:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 23:55:33 +0200 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <21021506.20050914235533@marcus-boerger.de> To: Edin Kadribasic Cc: Andi Gutmans , Zeev Suraski , In-Reply-To: <43283A26.7060000@emini.dk> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20050914142002.050b9cc0@localhost> <189821863.20050914163908@marcus-boerger.de> <43283A26.7060000@emini.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.1.0RC2 From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Edin, well imho it makes no sense to prefix all the iterators with Spl and also most of them are released already with 5.0. Changing those is to big of a BC issue isn't it? I mean it is different from changing a few consts very rarely used to class consts. marcus Wednesday, September 14, 2005, 4:56:38 PM, you wrote: > Marcus Boerger wrote: >> Hello Zeev, >> >> i tried to get any feedback from You or andi regarding SPL but none of you >> replied so far. Question is whether i should rename some of the new interfaces >> and classes to be prefixed by 'Spl'. Also should i drop all constants in SPL >> and instead provide class constants whcih we can do right now? Yes i know >> that might be BC issue but i'd say it is worth the little break and i am >> quite sure we shouldn't do it after 5.1 is out. And Last but not least i'd >> like to MFH two of the new classes if you don#t mind. > Hm, prefixing "new" interfaces and classes with Spl is the worst thing > one could do IMHO. Wouldn't it be the best to prefix *all* Spl > interfaces and classes? > Edin Best regards, Marcus