Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:18926
Return-Path: <andi@zend.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 20211 invoked by uid 1010); 14 Sep 2005 19:55:51 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 20196 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2005 19:55:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 14 Sep 2005 19:55:51 -0000
X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.74.107.235 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4)
Received: from ([80.74.107.235:49796] helo=mail.zend.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP
	id 80/9B-41173-64088234 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 15:55:51 -0400
Received: (qmail 6540 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2005 19:55:45 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO ANDI-NOTEBOOK.zend.com) (127.0.0.1)
	by localhost with SMTP; 14 Sep 2005 19:55:45 -0000
Message-ID: <6.2.3.4.2.20050914125504.038e5740@localhost>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:55:32 -0700
To: Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net>,Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <189821863.20050914163908@marcus-boerger.de>
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20050914142002.050b9cc0@localhost>
	<189821863.20050914163908@marcus-boerger.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.1.0RC2
From: andi@zend.com (Andi Gutmans)

I am sure I answered but I see Zeev has now (pretty much what I answered too :)

At 07:39 AM 9/14/2005, Marcus Boerger wrote:
>Hello Zeev,
>
>   i tried to get any feedback from You or andi regarding SPL but none of you
>replied so far. Question is whether i should rename some of the new interfaces
>and classes to be prefixed by 'Spl'. Also should i drop all constants in SPL
>and instead provide class constants whcih we can do right now? Yes i know
>that might be BC issue but i'd say it is worth the little break and i am
>quite sure we shouldn't do it after 5.1 is out. And Last but not least i'd
>like to MFH two of the new classes if you don#t mind.
>
>marcus
>
>Wednesday, September 14, 2005, 1:20:21 PM, you wrote:
>
> > Any last minute additions to 5.1.0RC2 or can we roll it?
>
> > Zeev
>
>
>
>
>Best regards,
>  Marcus