Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:18913 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 5852 invoked by uid 1010); 14 Sep 2005 16:06:49 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 5837 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2005 16:06:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Sep 2005 16:06:48 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 195.28.69.139 mail.jobtion.com Linux 2.4 w/o timestamps Received: from ([195.28.69.139:48493] helo=sparky.datcon.sk) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 6B/6D-41173-89A48234 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 12:06:48 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sparky.datcon.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2B12406E for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:06:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sparky.datcon.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sparky [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 27392-05-10 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:06:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [85.216.149.81] (chello085216149081.chello.sk [85.216.149.81]) by sparky.datcon.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6612469E for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:06:44 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <43284B13.8010907@kmit.sk> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:08:51 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050813 X-Accept-Language: sk, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals References: <5.1.0.14.2.20050914142002.050b9cc0@localhost> <189821863.20050914163908@marcus-boerger.de> <43283A26.7060000@emini.dk> <39.CA.41173.11348234@pb1.pair.com> In-Reply-To: <39.CA.41173.11348234@pb1.pair.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at datcon.sk Subject: namespaces (Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.1.0RC2) From: ondrej@kmit.sk (=?UTF-8?B?T25kcmVqIEl2YW5pxI0=?=) Jessie Hernandez wrote: > > This is one case where namespaces are useful. With my namespace patch, all > that would have to be done is to name the class as SPL:Observer. Users can > either implement SPL:Observer or first "import SPL:Observer;" and then > implement Observer. > Yes, this is a right task for a namespaces. What is current status of a patch? It will be included? -- Ondrej Ivanič (ondrej@kmit.sk