Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:18906
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Message-ID: <43283A26.7060000@emini.dk>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:56:38 +0200
Organization: Emini A/S
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net>
Cc: Andi Gutmans <andi@zend.com>, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>,
	internals@lists.php.net
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20050914142002.050b9cc0@localhost> <189821863.20050914163908@marcus-boerger.de>
In-Reply-To: <189821863.20050914163908@marcus-boerger.de>
OpenPGP: id=157D0FA8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.1.0RC2
From: edink@emini.dk (Edin Kadribasic)

Marcus Boerger wrote:
> Hello Zeev,
> 
>   i tried to get any feedback from You or andi regarding SPL but none of you
> replied so far. Question is whether i should rename some of the new interfaces
> and classes to be prefixed by 'Spl'. Also should i drop all constants in SPL
> and instead provide class constants whcih we can do right now? Yes i know
> that might be BC issue but i'd say it is worth the little break and i am
> quite sure we shouldn't do it after 5.1 is out. And Last but not least i'd
> like to MFH two of the new classes if you don#t mind.

Hm, prefixing "new" interfaces and classes with Spl is the worst thing
one could do IMHO. Wouldn't it be the best to prefix *all* Spl
interfaces and classes?

Edin