Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:18650 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 2930 invoked by uid 1010); 2 Sep 2005 05:27:13 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 2913 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2005 05:27:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Sep 2005 05:27:13 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 204.11.219.139 lerdorf.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([204.11.219.139:57808] helo=colo.lerdorf.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id D2/DE-15098-0B2E7134 for ; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 01:27:13 -0400 Received: from [192.168.200.106] (c-24-6-1-160.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.1.160]) (authenticated bits=0) by colo.lerdorf.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j825R7IS010371 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 1 Sep 2005 22:27:09 -0700 Message-ID: <4317E2AB.7080100@lerdorf.com> Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 22:27:07 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Gutmans CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <42D78B4A.7080208@fischer.name> <42D78B4A.7080208@fischer.name> <5.1.0.14.2.20050715120049.02739670@localhost> <431602E7.5050500@fischer.name> <6.2.3.4.2.20050901215122.03dd58c0@localhost> In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20050901215122.03dd58c0@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [Patch] tidy node and getParent From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus Lerdorf) Andi Gutmans wrote: > Hey Markus, > > As we're waiting for Wez to commit fixes, and this patch is just adding > a new function (and not messing with existing functionality), I think > it's OK to include... > We'll have to roll RC2. > Rasmus, Wez - Any idea about timing for PDO? Are all these bugs crucial > to fix for 5.1? I still think #34199 needs to be fixed. We have already analyzed it and the fix seems straightforward. I was hoping Stas would fix it since it is in his code. As for the PDO ones. I went through them today. I really don't have anybody to look at the Windows-related problems. But of the non-Windows ones I see: #33533 - Informix (we have no Informix experience) #33707 - Oracle #33876 - PostgreSQL (not sure this one is fixable in PHP) #33970 - MySQL #34185 - SQLite (can someone reproduce this one?) #34203 - PostgreSQL #34233 - PostgreSQL (reproduce?) #34235 - (Markus?) #34270 - Which DB? (reproduce?) So I can try to get someone to look at #33707, #33970, and #34203. The others either don't have enough info or I plain don't understand them well enough to get someone up to speed on how to fix them. -Rasmus