Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:18641 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 30626 invoked by uid 1010); 1 Sep 2005 08:38:51 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 30611 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2005 08:38:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Sep 2005 08:38:51 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 195.197.172.115 gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([195.197.172.115:49739] helo=gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 5A/CC-15098-A1EB6134 for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 04:38:50 -0400 Received: from nest.netphobia.fi (YZCLXVIII.dsl.saunalahti.fi [85.76.34.69]) by gw01.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2400F17DA; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 11:38:44 +0300 (EEST) Received: from nest.netphobia.fi (nest.netphobia.fi [127.0.0.1]) by nest.netphobia.fi (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j818cjLn025336; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 11:38:45 +0300 Received: from localhost (jani@localhost) by nest.netphobia.fi (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) with ESMTP id j818cjIp025333; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 11:38:45 +0300 X-Authentication-Warning: nest.netphobia.fi: jani owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 11:38:45 +0300 (EEST) Reply-To: Jani Taskinen To: Derick Rethans cc: Zeev Suraski , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <5.1.0.14.2.20050830050232.05ed1ec0@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1 From: sniper@iki.fi (Jani Taskinen) On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Derick Rethans wrote: > On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Derick Rethans wrote: > >> On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Zeev Suraski wrote: >> >>> For those of you who submitted patches to 5.1 since RC1 - do you believe that >>> we need another RC or can we go ahead and roll 5.1 final and run a sanity test >>> for 24 hours? I went over the patches, none of them appears to be too >>> dangerous, but if any of you thinks differently, let me know. >> >> Should I also commit: >> http://files.derickrethans.nl/patches/e_recoverable_error-php-5.1-20050826.diff.txt >> ? > > Should I assume that if nobody replies, there are no objections? I'm replying now and I don't want to see something like this in 5.1. This is new stuff, new stuff goes to HEAD.. --Jani