Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:18638 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 19761 invoked by uid 1010); 1 Sep 2005 08:26:44 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 19745 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2005 08:26:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Sep 2005 08:26:44 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 195.197.172.116 gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([195.197.172.116:52120] helo=gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 9D/3B-15098-44BB6134 for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 04:26:44 -0400 Received: from nest.netphobia.fi (YZCLXVIII.dsl.saunalahti.fi [85.76.34.69]) by gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC556D1DB9; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 11:26:38 +0300 (EEST) Received: from nest.netphobia.fi (nest.netphobia.fi [127.0.0.1]) by nest.netphobia.fi (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j818Qd1v025266; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 11:26:39 +0300 Received: from localhost (jani@localhost) by nest.netphobia.fi (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) with ESMTP id j818Qc98025263; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 11:26:38 +0300 X-Authentication-Warning: nest.netphobia.fi: jani owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 11:26:38 +0300 (EEST) Reply-To: Jani Taskinen To: Rob Richards cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <43164421.10503@ctindustries.net> Message-ID: References: <5.1.0.14.2.20050830050232.05ed1ec0@localhost> <43164421.10503@ctindustries.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1 From: sniper@iki.fi (Jani Taskinen) Done. All distros should have at least 2.6.8. Most have 2.6.16 or above.. --Jani On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, Rob Richards wrote: > I would suggest bumping up the libxm2 minimum version to 2.6.8. Had forgotten > about this until a recent bug, but 2.6.6 and 2.6.7 can cause memory corruption > thats fixed in 2.6.8. > > Rob > > Zeev Suraski wrote: > >> For those of you who submitted patches to 5.1 since RC1 - do you believe >> that we need another RC or can we go ahead and roll 5.1 final and run a >> sanity test for 24 hours? I went over the patches, none of them appears to >> be too dangerous, but if any of you thinks differently, let me know. >> >> Zeev >> > >