Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:18630 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 92209 invoked by uid 1010); 31 Aug 2005 23:52:17 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 92194 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2005 23:52:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 Aug 2005 23:52:16 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 216.117.147.250 unknown Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([216.117.147.250:33478] helo=ctindustries.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id CB/03-15098-0B246134 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:52:16 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dsta-aa203.pivot.net [66.186.171.203]) (authenticated bits=0) by ctindustries.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j7VMgUtI014520; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:42:35 -0400 Message-ID: <43164421.10503@ctindustries.net> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:58:25 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zeev Suraski CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <5.1.0.14.2.20050830050232.05ed1ec0@localhost> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20050830050232.05ed1ec0@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1049/Wed Aug 31 03:19:01 2005 on ctindustries.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1 From: rrichards@ctindustries.net (Rob Richards) I would suggest bumping up the libxm2 minimum version to 2.6.8. Had forgotten about this until a recent bug, but 2.6.6 and 2.6.7 can cause memory corruption thats fixed in 2.6.8. Rob Zeev Suraski wrote: > For those of you who submitted patches to 5.1 since RC1 - do you > believe that we need another RC or can we go ahead and roll 5.1 final > and run a sanity test for 24 hours? I went over the patches, none of > them appears to be too dangerous, but if any of you thinks > differently, let me know. > > Zeev >