Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:18619
Return-Path: <r.korving@xit.nl>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 74250 invoked by uid 1010); 31 Aug 2005 19:05:12 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 74234 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2005 19:05:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 31 Aug 2005 19:05:12 -0000
X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.238.144.71 korving.demon.nl  
Received: from ([212.238.144.71:9608] helo=localhost.localdomain)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP
	id 1C/45-15098-66FF5134 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:05:10 -0400
Message-ID: <1C.45.15098.66FF5134@pb1.pair.com>
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <42FCE0E4.604@lerdorf.com><005101c5ab53$1d977e70$6c051fac@lighthammer><129301c5ab69$71e31370$9cd96751@foxbox><6ec19ec7050827214249925901@mail.gmail.com> <43114C03.1070902@lerdorf.com><CC.7C.15098.99DA5134@pb1.pair.com> <8d9a42800508310620241ed8a4@mail.gmail.com><8d9a428005083106202fa3d5ea@mail.gmail.com> <BD.50.15098.482B5134@pb1.pair.com><1125499011.14188.7.camel@localhost.localdomain><4e89b426050831100460d0e161@mail.gmail.com> <442165525.20050831205210@marcus-boerger.de>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 20:58:05 +0200
Lines: 54
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
X-Posted-By: 212.238.144.71
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 6.0 Wishlist
From: r.korving@xit.nl ("Ron Korving")

+1

"Marcus Boerger" <helly@php.net> wrote in message
news:442165525.20050831205210@marcus-boerger.de...
> Hello Wez,
>
>   we could however drop '<%' support and introduce '<?php=' support.
> Along with that we might even add an E_STRICT to protect against '<?'.
>
> regards
> marcus
>
> Wednesday, August 31, 2005, 7:04:27 PM, you wrote:
>
> > But that's not going to happen any time soon (if ever); far too many
> > scripts use it.
>
> > --Wez.
>
> > On 8/31/05, John Coggeshall <john@coggeshall.org> wrote:
> >> Removing the <?= syntax from PHP 6 entirely right along with <% seems
> >> like a much better idea to me then trying to expand upon it.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >> On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 15:23 +0200, Ron Korving wrote:
> >> > Can't help it... ;) By the way, I thought all programmers were lazy
to some
> >> > extent?
> >> >
> >> > Seriously though, I think it would be nice and consistent if it would
work.
> >> > I just really like the short <?= syntax.
> >> >
> >> > Ron
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "Joseph Crawford" <codebowl@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> > news:8d9a428005083106202fa3d5ea@mail.gmail.com...
> >> > Why do you find the need to be lazy and use <?=$foo?> lol j/k
> >> >
> >> > i always use <?php echo $foo; ?> it may be only a few more chars of
code but
> >> > it is guranteed to work on any php installation ;)
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Joseph Crawford Jr.
> >> > Codebowl Solutions, Inc.
> >> > 1-802-671-2021
> >> > codebowl@gmail.com