Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:18549 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 77541 invoked by uid 1010); 30 Aug 2005 07:29:02 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 77526 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2005 07:29:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 30 Aug 2005 07:29:02 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.18.24.66 host-212-18-24-66.customer.m-online.net Received: from ([212.18.24.66:22705] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 6C/CD-15098-EBA04134 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 03:29:02 -0400 To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 09:28:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20050830092825.18c16d15.pierre@dotgeek.org> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20050830050232.05ed1ec0@localhost> X-Newsreader: Sylpheed version 2.0.0beta6 (GTK+ 2.6.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 212.18.24.66 Subject: Re: PHP 5.1 From: pierre@dotgeek.org (Pierre-Alain Joye) On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 05:06:07 +0300 zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) wrote: > For those of you who submitted patches to 5.1 since RC1 - do you > believe that we need another RC or can we go ahead and roll 5.1 > final and run a sanity test for 24 hours? I went over the > patches, none of them appears to be too dangerous, but if any of > you thinks differently, let me know. At least one patch has to be MFH'ed, the new instanceof commited by Dmitri last week. Besides that, a last RC is a safe choice, quiet a lot of commits have been done since RC1. Regards, --Pierre