Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:18508 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 45008 invoked by uid 1010); 28 Aug 2005 14:24:07 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 44993 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2005 14:24:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Aug 2005 14:24:07 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.38.9.232 gw2.emini.dk Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([192.38.9.232:8658] helo=gw2.emini.dk) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 17/F2-28235-509C1134 for ; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 10:24:05 -0400 Received: from foxbox (client-550-p-1-lns.glfd.dial.virgin.net [81.103.146.37]) by gw2.emini.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B46680925; Sun, 28 Aug 2005 16:23:58 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <12fe01c5abdc$229e6d50$9cd96751@foxbox> Reply-To: "Steph" To: "John Coggeshall" , "Jani Taskinen" Cc: "Rasmus Lerdorf" , , References: <43110D8D.9080008@lerdorf.com> <1125193332.27570.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 16:23:57 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5.1: Does it still require ext/xmlrpc for pear? From: steph@zend.com ("Steph") 'Replace'? Code written for ext/xmlrpc won't work with ext/xmlrpci. Will ext/xmlrpc be available in PECL, given that it doesn't appear to have an active maintainer? I'm well aware of ext/xmlrpc's limitations, haven't tried the new (but necessary) pecl/xmlrpci yet, and have the tiny issue that a bunch of my scripts will need a complete rewrite if the old extension is simply taken away from PHP 5 up. I suspect I'm far from being alone in that - do we have figures for core extension usage, anyone? ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Coggeshall" To: "Jani Taskinen" Cc: "Rasmus Lerdorf" ; ; Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 3:42 AM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5.1: Does it still require ext/xmlrpc for pear? > On that line though, I'd like to finish up the ext/xmlrpci ext I've got > in PECL and replace ext/xmlrpc. It'll eliminate the custom lib we have > for that ext, ground-up designed for PHP 5 (ext/soap style overloading, > etc.) Objections? > > Cheers, > > John > > On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 04:10 +0300, Jani Taskinen wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > > > > > Jani Taskinen wrote: > > >> > > >> If I understood correctly, the fixed XML_RPC pear package > > >> was updated to the PHP_5_1 branch already. Why is ext/xmlrpc > > >> still required? > > > > > > It isn't. > > > > Ok. Fix committed. :) > > > > --Jani > > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >