Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:18426 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 55914 invoked by uid 1010); 25 Aug 2005 13:17:04 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 55898 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2005 13:17:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Aug 2005 13:17:04 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 195.226.6.9 darkcity.gna.ch Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([195.226.6.9:54578] helo=darkcity.gna.ch) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 4A/2E-28235-EC4CD034 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:17:03 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darkcity.gna.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8F61A068E; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:16:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from unknown by localhost (amavisd-new, unix socket) id client-XXgFNv3u; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:16:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by darkcity.gna.ch (Postfix, from userid 65534) id B80951AE9A1; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:16:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.72] (unknown [195.226.9.186]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by darkcity.gna.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2292C1A22AA; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:16:55 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <430DC4C7.6090903@cschneid.com> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:16:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041207) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derick Rethans Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List References: <430DBD80.6090804@cschneid.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on darkcity.gna.ch X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.0.4 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gna.ch Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Property Overloading RFC From: cschneid@cschneid.com (Christian Schneider) Derick Rethans wrote: > If you would have properly read the proposal you see that there are 3! > problems with it. And instead of whining about things, I actually spend > some time of contributing with patches too. Let's agree to disagree. I easily work around these 3 "problems" here, so my patch would be empty. I know that I'm not contributing code, only my personal point of view and that's why I won't start crying if you guys decide to add properties to PHP. I just had the feeling that the discussion was never really properly decided, even amongst the core people on this list. Don't worry, I won't write any more follow-ups after this :-) > And how can you possibly argue that this more complex than all the other > OO crap that people are suggesting here.... I'm all with you there, I don't like that fancy OO crap either ;-) - Chris