Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:18419 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 37476 invoked by uid 1010); 25 Aug 2005 12:52:23 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 37460 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2005 12:52:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Aug 2005 12:52:23 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([82.94.239.5:57035] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 02/AB-28235-50FBD034 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 08:52:21 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j7PCqILs016309; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 14:52:18 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j7PCqBNr016281; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 14:52:13 +0200 Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 14:52:11 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: derick@localhost To: Christian Schneider cc: PHP Developers Mailing List In-Reply-To: <430DBD80.6090804@cschneid.com> Message-ID: References: <430DBD80.6090804@cschneid.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at jdi-ict.nl Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Property Overloading RFC From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Christian Schneider wrote: > Derick Rethans wrote: > > I updated the proposal: > > http://files.derickrethans.nl/property_overloading.html > > > > If nobody as any better idea on how to solve it I'd like to start > > implementing it. > > I seem to remember that we had some voices here stating that the current > mechanisms are sufficient. Adding new keywords and/or new magic methods is > something which should have a very high threshold as it complicates the > language. If you would have properly read the proposal you see that there are 3! problems with it. And instead of whining about things, I actually spend some time of contributing with patches too. And how can you possibly argue that this more complex than all the other OO crap that people are suggesting here.... regards, Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org