Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:18294 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 69380 invoked by uid 1010); 23 Aug 2005 08:44:18 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 69365 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2005 08:44:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Aug 2005 08:44:18 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 204.11.219.139 lerdorf.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([204.11.219.139:52324] helo=colo.lerdorf.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 71/16-28235-2E1EA034 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 04:44:18 -0400 Received: from [192.168.200.106] (c-24-6-1-160.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.1.160]) (authenticated bits=0) by colo.lerdorf.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j7N8iDJw014654 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 23 Aug 2005 01:44:13 -0700 Message-ID: <430AE1DC.7010207@lerdorf.com> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 01:44:12 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zeev Suraski CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <7B.41.33075.83F4A034@pb1.pair.com> <7B.41.33075.83F4A034@pb1.pair.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20050823105016.05f0fe60@localhost> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20050823105016.05f0fe60@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] sync complete From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus Lerdorf) Zeev Suraski wrote: > At 01:23 23/08/2005, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > >> Greg Beaver wrote: >> > I just synced php-src/pear (PHP_5_0/PHP_5_1/PHP_4_4) with pear-core >> > (PEAR_1_3). May god bring the day when this is no longer necessary >> > sooner rather than later. >> >> We'll get there. But we can't kill the 5.0 tree until we have a 5.1 >> release. > > > I don't see the 5.0 (or 4.4) trees dying anytime in the foreseeable > future. May God bring the day when we no longer have to support > security issues / major bugs in production releases :) I agree 4.4.x will live a long time due to the installed base and BC problems going from 4 to 5. But I think 5.0 can go away once we get a couple of releases into 5.1.x. The 5.0 installed base is small and the 5.0 to 5.1 migration is not difficult. -Rasmus