Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:18208 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 32112 invoked by uid 1010); 18 Aug 2005 13:03:03 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 32073 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2005 13:03:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Aug 2005 13:03:03 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 195.197.172.116 gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([195.197.172.116:44915] helo=gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id AC/23-33075-40784034 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:03:00 -0400 Received: from nest.netphobia.fi (YZCLXVIII.dsl.saunalahti.fi [85.76.34.69]) by gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5BF0D0BC8; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:02:54 +0300 (EEST) Received: from nest.netphobia.fi (nest.netphobia.fi [127.0.0.1]) by nest.netphobia.fi (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7ID2um3027470; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:02:56 +0300 Received: from localhost (jani@localhost) by nest.netphobia.fi (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) with ESMTP id j7ID2uR6027467; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:02:56 +0300 X-Authentication-Warning: nest.netphobia.fi: jani owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 16:02:55 +0300 (EEST) Reply-To: Jani Taskinen To: Lukas Smith cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <430468D5.1010304@php.net> Message-ID: References: <07.D6.33075.EA564034@pb1.pair.com> <430468D5.1010304@php.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] custom streams From: sniper@iki.fi (Jani Taskinen) On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Lukas Smith wrote: > Jani Taskinen wrote: >> >> Not critical enough to try and find the fix. >> Just use 5.1. As far as I'm concerned, 5.0 is dead along with 4.4 :) > > But why even bother with 5.0.5 .. or more specifically whats the purpose of Ask Zeev. > minor version if one gets released. So I presume alot of users will be > surprised when they find that numerous bugs they would expect to be fixed in a > 5.0.5 release. Feel free to go through every commit and check if it was MFH'd. :) > If however 5.0.5 never comes to light, then those users will know that they > will need to move to 5.1.0 to get the fixes for "fixed in CVS". I'd like to skip 5.0.5 and go with 5.1 instead. We just don't have enough resources to be able to handle 4 branches. (4.4, 5.0, 5.1, HEAD) --Jani