Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:18206 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 70395 invoked by uid 1010); 18 Aug 2005 11:23:02 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 70358 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2005 11:23:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Aug 2005 11:23:02 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.112.227.169 ipx11223.ipxserver.de Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([212.112.227.169:43414] helo=ipx11223.ipxserver.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id D6/BA-33075-8D864034 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 06:54:17 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ipx11223.ipxserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31784DF0047; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:54:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ipx11223.ipxserver.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ipx11223 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28295-01; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:54:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dsl-62-220-10-35.berlikomm.net [62.220.10.35]) by ipx11223.ipxserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26047DF0100; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:54:28 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <430468D5.1010304@php.net> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:54:13 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jani Taskinen Cc: internals@lists.php.net References: <07.D6.33075.EA564034@pb1.pair.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by somedaemon at backendmedia.com Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] custom streams From: lsmith@php.net (Lukas Smith) Jani Taskinen wrote: > > Not critical enough to try and find the fix. > Just use 5.1. As far as I'm concerned, 5.0 is dead along with 4.4 :) Sure. But why even bother with 5.0.5 .. or more specifically whats the purpose of 5.0.5? I presume there are other bugs which will follow the same fate and usually "fixed in CVS" means will be fixed in the next bugfix release for that minor version if one gets released. So I presume alot of users will be surprised when they find that numerous bugs they would expect to be fixed in a 5.0.5 release. If however 5.0.5 never comes to light, then those users will know that they will need to move to 5.1.0 to get the fixes for "fixed in CVS". regards, Lukas