Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:18085
Return-Path: <andrei@gravitonic.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 59766 invoked by uid 1010); 15 Aug 2005 03:26:40 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 59751 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2005 03:26:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 15 Aug 2005 03:26:39 -0000
X-Host-Fingerprint: 204.11.219.139 lerdorf.com Linux 2.4/2.6
Received: from ([204.11.219.139:60044] helo=colo.lerdorf.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP
	id C2/0F-33075-F6B00034 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 23:26:39 -0400
Received: from [192.168.11.2] (c-24-6-96-18.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.96.18])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by colo.lerdorf.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j7F3QUuw031824;
	Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:26:30 -0700
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0508141248100.2742@localhost>
References: <42FCE0E4.604@lerdorf.com> <1114795828.20050813012424@marcus-boerger.de> <42FD935D.8060602@prohost.org> <5DC75CC6-B8F8-4431-B031-606EA0BFF912@gravitonic.com> <42FD977E.1030705@prohost.org> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0508131422460.2742@localhost> <0ABEEE7D-6126-4C90-85B9-B2DDF2754287@gravitonic.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0508141248100.2742@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-ID: <133A42C8-184B-49F3-8EEA-3B595B4BD062@gravitonic.com>
Cc: Ilia Alshanetsky <ilia@prohost.org>, Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net>,
	Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com>,
	internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:26:54 -0700
To: Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733)
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 6.0 Wishlist
From: andrei@gravitonic.com (Andrei Zmievski)


Then why don't we put our collective brains together and think of a  
solution for this that does not involve hacks?

-Andrei

On Aug 14, 2005, at 3:51 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:
>
> In quite some cases for me i'm sure there are no surrogates in the  
> text
> I'm parsing. Having to deal with rescanning the string for every
> access to a character is not really wanted.
>
> Derick
>