Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:18048 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 6475 invoked by uid 1010); 14 Aug 2005 10:52:01 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 6459 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2005 10:52:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Aug 2005 10:52:01 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([82.94.239.5:49423] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id E9/7B-33075-0522FF24 for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 06:52:00 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j7EApuFA016407 for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 12:51:56 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j7EApnrk016385; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 12:51:50 +0200 Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 12:51:47 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: derick@localhost To: Andrei Zmievski cc: Ilia Alshanetsky , Marcus Boerger , Rasmus Lerdorf , internals In-Reply-To: <0ABEEE7D-6126-4C90-85B9-B2DDF2754287@gravitonic.com> Message-ID: References: <42FCE0E4.604@lerdorf.com> <1114795828.20050813012424@marcus-boerger.de> <42FD935D.8060602@prohost.org> <5DC75CC6-B8F8-4431-B031-606EA0BFF912@gravitonic.com> <42FD977E.1030705@prohost.org> <0ABEEE7D-6126-4C90-85B9-B2DDF2754287@gravitonic.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at jdi-ict.nl Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 6.0 Wishlist From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, Andrei Zmievski wrote: > So, you'd rather have PHP users gain some speed at the expense of having to > check for surrogates everywhere? In quite some cases for me i'm sure there are no surrogates in the text I'm parsing. Having to deal with rescanning the string for every access to a character is not really wanted. Derick