Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:18037
Return-Path: <andrei@gravitonic.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 95587 invoked by uid 1010); 14 Aug 2005 04:53:58 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 95572 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2005 04:53:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 14 Aug 2005 04:53:58 -0000
X-Host-Fingerprint: 204.11.219.139 lerdorf.com Linux 2.4/2.6
Received: from ([204.11.219.139:35773] helo=colo.lerdorf.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP
	id C3/9F-33075-46ECEF24 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 00:53:57 -0400
Received: from [192.168.11.2] (c-24-6-96-18.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.96.18])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by colo.lerdorf.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j7E4rl5h012812;
	Sat, 13 Aug 2005 21:53:47 -0700
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0508131422460.2742@localhost>
References: <42FCE0E4.604@lerdorf.com> <1114795828.20050813012424@marcus-boerger.de> <42FD935D.8060602@prohost.org> <5DC75CC6-B8F8-4431-B031-606EA0BFF912@gravitonic.com> <42FD977E.1030705@prohost.org> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0508131422460.2742@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-ID: <0ABEEE7D-6126-4C90-85B9-B2DDF2754287@gravitonic.com>
Cc: Ilia Alshanetsky <ilia@prohost.org>, Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net>,
	Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com>,
	internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 21:54:10 -0700
To: Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733)
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 6.0 Wishlist
From: andrei@gravitonic.com (Andrei Zmievski)

So, you'd rather have PHP users gain some speed at the expense of  
having to check for surrogates everywhere?

-Andrei


On Aug 13, 2005, at 5:23 AM, Derick Rethans wrote:

> On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
>
>
>> I thought we've discussed making one access code-units and the other
>> code-points?
>>
>
> And the reason why I want this is speed. [1231231] vs. {1231231},  
> having
> the first one access codeunits would be quite a lot faster as not the
> whole string has to be scanned for every usage of {}.
>
> Derick
>
> -- 
> Derick Rethans
> http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org
>