Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:17996 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 6634 invoked by uid 1010); 13 Aug 2005 21:23:56 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 6619 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2005 21:23:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Aug 2005 21:23:56 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 66.80.117.3 longsword.omniti.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([66.80.117.3:41363] helo=mail.omniti.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 27/65-33075-AE46EF24 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 17:23:55 -0400 Authentication-Results: mail.omniti.com smtp.user=george; auth=pass (LOGIN) DomainKey-Status: good X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_sign implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 DomainKey-Signature: q=dns; a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=test; d=omniti.com; h=Received:In-Reply-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer; b=RSd9q2AH8Ljdac996kTfP/5iXz7d+uEuYyNesH91jcTgyygktVX6HwDeREyCsSLK jOP01Ry+m6IYMO85q8AnYoMyVPJf0AtxDeJvPN1e3InL12dAPtu2Ec9/J75WUTRl Received: from ([66.80.117.2:65277] helo=[192.168.219.134]) by mail.omniti.com (ecelerity 2.0 r(6416M)) with SMTP id A4/20-29456-08B5EF24 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 16:43:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: <42FCE0E4.604@lerdorf.com> <416F97E8-FE59-4297-B983-64E643939E3B@omniti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-ID: <304BAE50-0FFC-4FFB-B165-CE3C5E1163C9@omniti.com> Cc: George Schlossnagle , Rasmus Lerdorf , internals Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 16:43:40 -0400 To: Derick Rethans X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 6.0 Wishlist From: george@omniti.com (George Schlossnagle) On Aug 13, 2005, at 3:21 PM, Derick Rethans wrote: > On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, George Schlossnagle wrote: > > >> Good. That function would be evil (imho). Given that you can't >> access >> super-globals as variable-variables, I think that having to really >> get at >> _RAW_GET[] will make it much more transparent when an application >> is using >> unfiltered data. >> > > But then everybody will just start using $_RAW_GET instead of $_GET. > What will that solve? No... reasonable people will use _GET. Applications that need to use _RAW_GET will do so, and (due to the lack of variable variables support for it) be easy to track down. With a function it's much harder to track when you're getting the filtered attay or the raw array. George