Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:17987
Return-Path: <ilia@prohost.org>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 76749 invoked by uid 1010); 13 Aug 2005 19:56:48 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 76734 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2005 19:56:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 13 Aug 2005 19:56:48 -0000
X-Host-Fingerprint: 70.85.46.36 unknown  
Received: from ([70.85.46.36:43680] helo=prohost.org)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP
	id D0/D1-33075-F705EF24 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 15:56:47 -0400
Received: (qmail 29462 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2005 19:56:44 -0000
Received: from cpe00095beeab35-cm000f9f7d6664.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com (HELO ?192.168.1.101?) (69.196.31.219)
	by prohost.org with SMTP; 13 Aug 2005 19:56:44 -0000
Message-ID: <42FE507A.9050009@prohost.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 15:56:42 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>
CC: George Schlossnagle <george@omniti.com>, 
	Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com>,
	internals <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <42FCE0E4.604@lerdorf.com> <416F97E8-FE59-4297-B983-64E643939E3B@omniti.com>	<Pine.LNX.4.62.0508122018300.2742@localhost> <CD6C7885-403B-42CE-838A-778E63474BFE@omniti.com>	<Pine.LNX.4.62.0508131414090.2742@localhost> <A7C10125-78FB-4EF6-A83E-6555C90F335B@omniti.com> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0508132120590.2742@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0508132120590.2742@localhost>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 6.0 Wishlist
From: ilia@prohost.org (Ilia Alshanetsky)

Derick,

That would not be much different then someone doing
foreach (array_keys($_GET) $v) $_GET[$v] = get_raw(GET, $v);

If anything locating RAW super-global would be easier, making auditing
coding reliant on it a bit simpler.

IMHO.

Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, George Schlossnagle wrote:
> 
> 
>>Good.  That function would be evil (imho).   Given that you can't access
>>super-globals as variable-variables, I think that having to really get at
>>_RAW_GET[] will make it much more transparent when an application is using
>>unfiltered data.
> 
> 
> But then everybody will just start using $_RAW_GET instead of $_GET. 
> What will that solve?
> 
> Derick