Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:17971 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 79490 invoked by uid 1010); 13 Aug 2005 14:59:49 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 79475 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2005 14:59:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Aug 2005 14:59:49 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 66.80.117.3 longsword.omniti.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([66.80.117.3:48710] helo=mail.omniti.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id B4/17-33075-5360EF24 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 10:39:49 -0400 Authentication-Results: mail.omniti.com smtp.user=george; auth=pass (LOGIN) DomainKey-Status: good X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_sign implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 DomainKey-Signature: q=dns; a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=test; d=omniti.com; h=Received:In-Reply-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer; b=Wx20uPpAQyOwOlhGec/8lX+yd8JlnWTWqFUJ++zxZZf7Kt5NHbnPICPJctZ3mL+t kVXq7Xc6vCVwNMV/Uo1ws1nlkOq44rKJkG6AYp1uc4OzeV0iti79yFFbuQm3vgnL Received: from ([66.80.117.2:64523] helo=[192.168.219.134]) by mail.omniti.com (ecelerity 2.0 r(6416M)) with SMTP id E9/20-09655-D260EF24 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 10:39:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: <42FCE0E4.604@lerdorf.com> <416F97E8-FE59-4297-B983-64E643939E3B@omniti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-ID: Cc: George Schlossnagle , Rasmus Lerdorf , internals Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 10:39:37 -0400 To: Derick Rethans X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 6.0 Wishlist From: george@omniti.com (George Schlossnagle) On Aug 13, 2005, at 8:14 AM, Derick Rethans wrote: > On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, George Schlossnagle wrote: > > >>> I wrote up the following spec for this extension: >>> http://files.derickrethans.nl/filter_extension.html >>> >> >> Where's the part about an application swapping back for the raw >> arrays (as >> opposed to accessing them specifically as _RAW_GET or whatever)? >> Or are you >> and Rasmus talking about two different proposals? >> > > Nah, we discussed this thing for a bit, but I didn't add that function > yet to this RFC. Good. That function would be evil (imho). Given that you can't access super-globals as variable-variables, I think that having to really get at _RAW_GET[] will make it much more transparent when an application is using unfiltered data. George