Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:17964 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 60173 invoked by uid 1010); 13 Aug 2005 13:50:56 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 60157 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2005 13:50:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Aug 2005 13:50:55 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 84.57.2.254 dsl-084-057-002-254.arcor-ip.net Received: from ([84.57.2.254:19943] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id F7/E5-33075-FBAFDF24 for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 09:50:55 -0400 To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 15:50:55 +0200 Message-ID: <20050813155055.03eb7577.pierre@dotgeek.org> References: <42FCE0E4.604@lerdorf.com> <416F97E8-FE59-4297-B983-64E643939E3B@omniti.com> X-Newsreader: Sylpheed version 2.0.0beta6 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 84.57.2.254 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 6.0 Wishlist From: pierre@dotgeek.org (Pierre-Alain Joye) On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:19:04 +0200 (CEST) derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) wrote: > On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, George Schlossnagle wrote: > > > > 3. Add input filter extension which will include a mechanism > > > for application developers to very easily turn it off which > > > would swap the raw GPC arrays back in case the site had it > > > turned on by default. > > > > That seems a bit scary, and almost as if it would defeat the > > purpose. I'm all for an input filter extension, but it should > > be one that can't be easily neutered by (potentially malicious) > > applications. > > I wrote up the following spec for this extension: > http://files.derickrethans.nl/filter_extension.html It lools globally good for the principles. Details can be changed during implementation/experimentations phases. I only disagree with E_NOTICE. All these validations should be silent. Derick, as far as I remember, you have some doubts about that too. As you may noticed before, I have some problems with noisy functions in general :) Regards, --Pierre