Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:17859
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:34:29 +0200
Reply-To: Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net>
Message-ID: <1688137061.20050812083429@marcus-boerger.de>
To: Jessie Hernandez <jrhernandez05@gmail.com>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <C2.E7.33075.57C1CF24@pb1.pair.com>
References: <C2.E7.33075.57C1CF24@pb1.pair.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Allow functions in namespaces?
From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger)

Hello Jessie,

  don't overcomplicate it, just stay with classes.

marcus

Friday, August 12, 2005, 5:50:08 AM, you wrote:

> Right now, my patch is complete as respects classes inside namespaces,
> simple import, namespace imports, etc. I just made a few changes locally to
> see how feasible it was to allow functions inside namespaces, and it was
> actually very simple. Like classes, the functions internally are prefixed
> with the namespace name and a colon, e.g.:

> <?php
> namespace test_ns
> {
>     function test_func
>     {
>         echo "hello!\n";
>     }
> }

> test_func(); // generates an error, 'test_func' does not exist

> test_ns:test_func(); // prints "hello!"
?>>


> I haven't done anything with functions as regards imports, and I think it
> would be difficult/useless to do so. Simple imports might be easy, but what
> about namespace imports? There is no such concept as __autoload for
> functions, so namespace imports for functions would be discarded. Also, if
> you import foo:bar, you don't know if this is a function or a class. The
> former syntax of "import function/class foo from bar" would need to be
> used, and this syntax was very ugly IMHO.

> So, I ask, would it be useful to have functions inside namespaces and only
> use it as above? Imports would only work for classes, and the only change
> would be that you can reference functions with a colon (of course, just
> like classes, you cannot declare a function name with a colon, only
> reference it).

> Let me know what you guys think. My Beta 2 patch is working great as it is,
> and I suspect the majority of the users who want namespaces is to simply
> group/organize their classes anyways.


> Regards,

> Jessie Hernandez




Best regards,
 Marcus