Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:17729 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 51348 invoked by uid 1010); 9 Aug 2005 19:42:15 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 51333 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2005 19:42:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Aug 2005 19:42:15 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 204.11.219.139 lerdorf.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([204.11.219.139:50852] helo=colo.lerdorf.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id FF/9C-04646-61709F24 for ; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 15:42:14 -0400 Received: from [207.126.233.18] (rasmus2.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.233.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by colo.lerdorf.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j79Jg8Ll005007 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 9 Aug 2005 12:42:08 -0700 Message-ID: <42F90710.1040301@lerdorf.com> Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 12:42:08 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: steve roussey CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <57792e85050808205143e96a8f@mail.gmail.com> <42F82AE3.6070602@lerdorf.com> <57792e8505080912126bd0842d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <57792e8505080912126bd0842d@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Moving to PHP5.1 and Apache 2.2 next year, need help From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus Lerdorf) steve roussey wrote: > I know my name can be easily traced to a website I own that only gets > about 10M pv/day but I also work as a consultant for another that gets > an order of magnitude more. So perhaps you do get more then them and > get 1B pv/day and your dad can beat up my dad. Ug. Strike that. I'm > just frustrated and stressed. (My own website doesn't even need the db > connection pooling just yet. Though it could use Keep-Alive..) Well, I can generally safely say that unless you also happen to work at Yahoo! in which case we are tied. ;) -Rasmus