Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:17689 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 11190 invoked by uid 1010); 9 Aug 2005 11:16:19 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 11174 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2005 11:16:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Aug 2005 11:16:19 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.18.24.66 host-212-18-24-66.customer.m-online.net Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([212.18.24.66:30409] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id 2E/01-04646-77098F24 for ; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 07:16:10 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j79BG08T006185; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 13:16:00 +0200 Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 13:16:00 +0200 To: Derick Rethans Cc: internals@lists.php.net Message-ID: <20050809131600.30eee50e.pierre@dotgeek.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20050809120438.0a2320bc.pierre@dotgeek.org> <20050809125232.7df2acc5.pierre@dotgeek.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.0beta6 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5.5 or 6.0 From: pierre@dotgeek.org (Pierre-Alain Joye) On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 13:02:47 +0200 (CEST) Derick Rethans wrote: > On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote: > > > On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 12:47:50 +0200 (CEST) > > derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote: > > > > > > > But I have some about what we will do in php 5.x (without > > > > unicode, namespace), and 6.0. > > > > > > > > I like to see once that we clearly and loudly define what we > > > > want in or not. So I may waste less time than before. > > > > > > I see it as: > > > 4.4 - no new features, no new additions. Just bugfixes. > > > 5.1 - no new major features, just smaller additions. > > > 6.0 - brand new experimental stuff. > > > > That sounds basically good to me. > > > > My small thoughts: > > > > 5.1.x - bug fixes _only_ > > 5.x - small additions (in my case, gd updates and merge, > > xmlwriter) > > I don't think we should be going with another 5.x release as > we've plenty of stuff to do for 6.0, gd updates/merges should go > to 5.1.x too. I'm not sure that a merge fits in 5.1.x, the amount of changes are relatively big and are far away from bug fixes. > If we want to include xmlwriter at all in the > default distribution is another discussion. (So that should go to > another thread IMO). The discussion is already done and we agreed. It did not make it in 5.1 for various reasons. I only stated two of my todos here. Regards, --Pierre