Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:17688 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 6611 invoked by uid 1010); 9 Aug 2005 11:02:54 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 6596 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2005 11:02:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Aug 2005 11:02:54 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([82.94.239.5:39663] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6323M)) with SMTP id DB/A0-04646-C5D88F24 for ; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 07:02:53 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j79B2nHH010834 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 13:02:49 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j79B2llX010824; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 13:02:47 +0200 Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 13:02:47 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: derick@localhost To: Pierre-Alain Joye cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <20050809125232.7df2acc5.pierre@dotgeek.org> Message-ID: References: <20050809120438.0a2320bc.pierre@dotgeek.org> <20050809125232.7df2acc5.pierre@dotgeek.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at jdi-ict.nl Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 5.5 or 6.0 From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote: > On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 12:47:50 +0200 (CEST) > derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) wrote: > > > On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote: > > > > > But I have some about what we will do in php 5.x (without > > > unicode, namespace), and 6.0. > > > > > > I like to see once that we clearly and loudly define what we > > > want in or not. So I may waste less time than before. > > > > I see it as: > > 4.4 - no new features, no new additions. Just bugfixes. > > 5.1 - no new major features, just smaller additions. > > 6.0 - brand new experimental stuff. > > That sounds basically good to me. > > My small thoughts: > > 5.1.x - bug fixes _only_ > 5.x - small additions (in my case, gd updates and merge, > xmlwriter) I don't think we should be going with another 5.x release as we've plenty of stuff to do for 6.0, gd updates/merges should go to 5.1.x too. If we want to include xmlwriter at all in the default distribution is another discussion. (So that should go to another thread IMO). regards, Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org