Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:17318 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 9457 invoked by uid 1010); 18 Jul 2005 14:39:05 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 9442 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2005 14:39:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Jul 2005 14:39:05 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 195.114.173.133 lars.internetia.pl Received: from ([195.114.173.133:33054] helo=lars.internetia.pl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.0 beta r(6227M)) with SMTP id D9/DC-61486-90FBBD24 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 10:39:05 -0400 Received: from szafir.internetia.pl ([212.106.7.66.65419]) by lars.internetia.pl with esmtp (Exim 3.35) envelope-from for id 1DuWlq-0001zU-00; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:39:02 +0200 Received: from granat.internetia.pl ([195.114.173.177.54918] helo=[10.114.160.200]) by szafir.internetia.pl with esmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.35) envelope-from for id 1DuWlZ-0006K1-00; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:38:45 +0200 Organization: Netia SA To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:38:42 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <200507181557.23627.Piotr_Roszatycki@netia.net.pl> <0CAB6605-9784-4598-B0BF-4A801502F6BE@plexpod.com> <28812062-4A1A-40DD-82D6-007BA1076EEB@omniti.com> In-Reply-To: <28812062-4A1A-40DD-82D6-007BA1076EEB@omniti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-ID: <200507181638.42585.Piotr_Roszatycki@netia.net.pl> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] mail() into separate extension? From: Piotr_Roszatycki@netia.net.pl (Piotr Roszatycki) On Monday 18 of July 2005 16:35, George Schlossnagle wrote: > Sure. They inevitably will have differing behaviors (if not, why not > just have a single unified function). Given that, you'll have > different behaviors on different machines in a way that is not > terribly transparent to end-users. That's evil. In fact the replacement for mail() function have to be transparent for end-users. They won't replace manually calls for mail() function with i.e. mail_smtp() function. That is the reason I would like to replace original function. -- .''`. Piotr Roszatycki, Netia SA : :' : mailto:Piotr_Roszatycki@netia.net.pl `. `' mailto:dexter@debian.org `-