Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:17004 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 30149 invoked by uid 1010); 29 Jun 2005 14:22:53 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 30134 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2005 14:22:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pb1.pair.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Jun 2005 14:22:53 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([82.94.239.5:38219] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 1.2 r(5656M)) with SMTP id 67/78-00424-BBEA2C24 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:22:52 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5TEMmui029312; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:22:48 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5TEMjM3029295; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:22:45 +0200 Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:22:45 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: derick@localhost To: Sebastian Mendel cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <6A.A7.00424.EADA2C24@pb1.pair.com> Message-ID: References: <42BDDC82.6020208@ohgaki.net> <17088.52397.92440.326561@desk.crynwr.com> <42C0CF76.6090203@lerdorf.com> <42C0F4DA.4000605@php.net> <17089.18702.450236.614561@desk.crynwr.com> <42C225F7.1060201@lerdorf.com> <17090.14242.815242.149673@desk.crynwr.com> <3br12t95.fsf@random.internal> <6A.A7.00424.EADA2C24@pb1.pair.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at jci-ict.nl Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] allow_url_fopen should be INI_ALL From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Sebastian Mendel wrote: > Derrell.Lipman@UnwiredUniverse.com wrote: > > Jani Taskinen writes: > > > >> Please troll, do you go away if I close my eyes? > > > > That's not fair. Russell is providing strong arguments and rebuttals for > > every point. You may not agree with his points, but what he's doing is not > > trolling. This discussion seems to have strong backing on both sides of the > > issue. > > i agree full! > > isnt it possible to add a check to the include*()/require*() statement > that checks the parameter for existence in the superglobal $_REQUEST No, this is technically not possible, now go play somewhere else. Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org