Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:16977 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 38681 invoked by uid 1010); 29 Jun 2005 01:30:13 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 38665 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2005 01:30:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO crynwr.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Jun 2005 01:30:13 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.203.178.14 ns1.crynwr.com Linux 2.0.3x (1) Received: from ([192.203.178.14:1657] helo=ns1.crynwr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 1.2 r(5656M)) with SMTP id 3F/ED-00424-5A9F1C24 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 21:30:13 -0400 Received: (qmail 15767 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2005 01:30:08 -0000 Received: from dpc6745223014.direcpc.com (HELO desk.crynwr.com) (67.45.223.14) by pdam.crynwr.com with SMTP; 29 Jun 2005 01:30:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 29649 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2005 01:28:57 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dog; d=crynwr.com; b=Li4xY64/k7tN9z5oQUjN8PESiLeqNBUdZCy4UjDe5GBdB5qesO1GhPeu1Rt02VwL ; MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17089.63833.772427.529013@desk.crynwr.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 21:28:57 -0400 To: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <1119998580.13690.109.camel@localhost> References: <42BDDC82.6020208@ohgaki.net> <17088.52397.92440.326561@desk.crynwr.com> <42C0CF76.6090203@lerdorf.com> <42C0F4DA.4000605@php.net> <17089.18702.450236.614561@desk.crynwr.com> <1119998580.13690.109.camel@localhost> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] allow_url_fopen should be INI_ALL From: nelson@crynwr.com (Russell Nelson) Al Baker writes: > Turning PHP into a babysitter Nothing you wrote explains why so many people have had this problem. Everything you write is an attempt to deny that the problem exists, deny that serious programmers have the problem, deny that the problem is due to a badly designed intrinsic, and deny that the intrinsic should be redesigned so that its sharp edges are either softened or made apparent. Graphical user interface designers understand the idea of an 'affordance'. An affordance is something whose operation is obvious simply by looking at it. An uparrow button moves something upwards. 'include' is an affordance. It obviously includes a local file. In essence, php's include is an apple with a razor blade hidden in it. In essence, allow_url_fopen==no wraps all fruit with a metal mesh so when you bite into them, your mouth is protected from the razor blade in the apple. Unfortunately, the only fruit which has ever been found to have razor blades in it are the apples. > I agree with Stefan's previous emails. Even the part where he agrees with something Rasmus didn't say? -- --My blog is at blog.russnelson.com | If you want to find Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | injustice in economic 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-323-1241 | affairs, look for the Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | | hand of a legislator.