Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:16931 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 17848 invoked by uid 1010); 27 Jun 2005 07:36:59 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 17833 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2005 07:36:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Jun 2005 07:36:59 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([82.94.239.5:36392] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 1.2 r(5656M)) with SMTP id CE/A5-00424-A9CAFB24 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 03:36:58 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5R7atjt018019 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 09:36:55 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5R7andw017996; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 09:36:50 +0200 Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 09:36:49 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: derick@localhost To: Rasmus Lerdorf cc: Stefan Esser , PHP Developers Mailing List In-Reply-To: <42BFAB75.4090103@lerdorf.com> Message-ID: References: <42BDDC82.6020208@ohgaki.net> <01.6A.54439.491DEB24@pb1.pair.com> <20050626164101.GA11586@dune> <42BEE432.6090307@teh.ath.cx> <20050626175638.GB11586@dune> <42BEEED1.6010602@php.net> <42BF9A46.4060108@ohgaki.net> <42BFA99D.70004@php.net> <42BFAB75.4090103@lerdorf.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at jci-ict.nl Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: allow_url_fopen should be INI_ALL From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > Yikes, when did that happen? I have been out of Internet reach in the > wilds of Finland for a few days, so I missed a bunch of stuff, but > making allow_url_fopen an INI_ALL option seems like a fantastically bad > idea. Admins should be able to control such settings. It has been INI_ALL for a looong time until somebody decided to set it to INI_SYSTEM. Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org