Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:15931 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 57952 invoked by uid 1010); 9 Apr 2005 15:48:18 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 57922 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2005 15:48:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pb1.pair.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Apr 2005 15:48:15 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 203.10.1.132 vscan02.westnet.com.au Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([203.10.1.132:45773] helo=vscan02.westnet.com.au) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity HEAD r(5268)) with SMTP id BE/35-19272-C39F7524 for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 11:48:13 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id C494411CDA0; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 23:46:19 +0800 (WST) Received: from vscan02.westnet.com.au ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vscan02.westnet.com.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25887-06; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 23:46:19 +0800 (WST) Received: from [202.72.133.22] (dsl-202-72-133-22.wa.westnet.com.au [202.72.133.22]) by vscan02.westnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E2E11CE75; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 23:46:19 +0800 (WST) Message-ID: <4257F933.5000301@familyhealth.com.au> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 23:48:03 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Scott Cc: internals@lists.php.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PDO proposal: add PDOStatement::nextResult() method to support stored procedures From: chriskl@familyhealth.com.au (Christopher Kings-Lynne) > PDO API. Many databases (Apache Derby, DB2, Microsoft SQL Server, > MySQL 5, and PostgreSQL to a certain extent) support stored procedures PostgreSQL to a certain extent, what the...? Anyway, why do stored procs need to be treated differently to normal results? In PostgreSQL they just return results like normal SELECTs... Chris