Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:15773 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 79181 invoked by uid 1010); 3 Apr 2005 22:12:07 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 79164 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2005 22:12:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pb1.pair.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Apr 2005 22:12:07 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.169.182.136 h59705.serverkompetenz.net Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([81.169.182.136:45340] helo=strato.aixcept.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity HEAD r(5268)) with SMTP id 8C/A2-19272-73A60524 for ; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 18:12:07 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by strato.aixcept.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D9A35C1CD; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 00:17:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 18:12:04 -0400 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <838524474.20050403181204@marcus-boerger.de> To: Andi Gutmans Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20050402185139.027d4cc0@localhost> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20050402185139.027d4cc0@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1 Beta 1 From: mail@marcus-boerger.de (Marcus Boerger) Hello Andi, Saturday, April 2, 2005, 10:53:19 PM, you wrote: > Hey, > I'd like to roll PHP 5.1 Beta 1 very soon. > Wez, I've been waiting for PDO in order to get this going. Do you feel it's > mature enough or should I hold off some more time? > Also, has someone already integrated PDO configure switches with the old > --with-db configure switches? (i.e. the idea was that --with-mysql would > enable pdo-mysql too so that we don't get lost with a million configure > switches). > Andi Can we get some things straight first (i guess that's the idea of an alpha). I'd like to reintroduce __toString() since 5.1 is supposed to make it work again. The patching should be easy enough since we left in most of the necessary code as we planned to reintroduce it in the first place. Then i think we need to enable return by reference in c functions to get array overloading fixed. For thta you have a patch from me. As you have for several other things :-) However most important seems to be fixing return by reference. Derick and me already did a lot of analysis, weeks of and and. Maybe you want to help. regards marcus