Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:15648 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 5605 invoked by uid 1010); 29 Mar 2005 08:11:31 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 5590 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2005 08:11:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO iki.fi) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Mar 2005 08:11:31 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 195.197.172.116 gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([195.197.172.116:44591] helo=gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity HEAD r(5268)) with SMTP id 22/1C-10638-2BD09424 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 03:11:30 -0500 Received: from nest.netphobia.fi (YZCLXVIII.dsl.saunalahti.fi [85.76.34.69]) by gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EFFBBBCDE; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:11:27 +0300 (EEST) Received: from nest.netphobia.fi (nest.netphobia.fi [127.0.0.1]) by nest.netphobia.fi (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j2T8BRkB030060; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:11:27 +0300 Received: from localhost (jani@localhost) by nest.netphobia.fi (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) with ESMTP id j2T8BRwh030057; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:11:27 +0300 X-Authentication-Warning: nest.netphobia.fi: jani owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:11:27 +0300 (EEST) Reply-To: Jani Taskinen To: Jon Parise Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <20050327221532.GA17108@csh.rit.edu> Message-ID: References: <20050327221532.GA17108@csh.rit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Build system support for stock FreeBSD autoconf ports From: sniper@iki.fi (Jani Taskinen) On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Jon Parise wrote: > The attached patch allows PHP's build system to recognize FreeBSD's > "versioned" autoconf ports without the need for system-level symlinks > or similar aliasing. It uses 'shtool path' to (attempt to) locate the > appropriate autoconf / autoheader executable. I added such patch once but Sebastian got some problems with it so it was reverted. And I don't want to add this patch either unless there is very good reason to do so. There are no known problems of running buildconf with autoconf 2.13, so why shouldn't that be allowed? (it's actually PREFERRED version :) And finally: Common users should NEVER EVER run buildconf. --Jani 5B