Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:15410 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 82217 invoked by uid 1010); 13 Mar 2005 01:19:05 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 82169 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2005 01:19:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jefferyfernandez.id.au) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Mar 2005 01:19:05 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 203.59.3.35 mail-03.iinet.net.au Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([203.59.3.35:49512] helo=mail.iinet.net.au) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity HEAD r(5124)) with SMTP id 67/C3-31540-70593324 for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 20:19:04 -0500 Received: (qmail 27413 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2005 01:19:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.1.1.66?) (203.173.46.98) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 13 Mar 2005 01:18:59 -0000 Message-ID: <42339502.3040205@jefferyfernandez.id.au> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 12:18:58 +1100 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Johannes Schlueter CC: internals@lists.php.net, smith@backendmedia.com References: <200503130016.15221.johannes@php.net> <42337F87.2010802@jefferyfernandez.id.au> <200503130212.53764.johannes@php.net> In-Reply-To: <200503130212.53764.johannes@php.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [patch] highlight_[file|string] and line numbers From: forums@jefferyfernandez.id.au (Jeffery Fernandez) Johannes Schlueter wrote: >Hi Jeffery, > >On Sunday 13 March 2005 00:47, Jeffery Fernandez wrote: > > >>That looks very good but there seems to be serious html issues when I >>validated that page... Total 1789 erros when I validated that page at >>w3c. If you can fix that it would be awesome. >> >> > >Try to validate it as XHTML1.0 and, since the function is for embedding into >other documents, keep in mind that the output is missing the doctype header >and tag and so on, it's only the

... part. > >johannes > > > You could be right.. I haven't tested the output within a valid doc type page