Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:15409 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 77256 invoked by uid 1010); 13 Mar 2005 01:14:50 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 77236 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2005 01:14:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Mar 2005 01:14:50 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.165.35.142 thinkforge.org Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([82.165.35.142:16810] helo=mail.mayflowersystem.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity HEAD r(5124)) with SMTP id 61/63-31540-90493324 for ; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 20:14:50 -0500 Received: (qmail 10523 invoked by uid 60010); 13 Mar 2005 01:14:47 -0000 Received: from 62.158.201.40 by mail (envelope-from , uid 89) with qmail-scanner-1.24 (uvscan: v4.3.20/v4362. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(62.158.201.40):. Processed in 0.447741 secs); 13 Mar 2005 01:14:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.7?) (schlueter@mayflower.de@62.158.201.40) by 0 with (RC4-MD5 encrypted) SMTP; 13 Mar 2005 01:14:46 -0000 To: Jeffery Fernandez Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 02:12:53 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: internals@lists.php.net, smith@backendmedia.com References: <200503130016.15221.johannes@php.net> <42337F87.2010802@jefferyfernandez.id.au> In-Reply-To: <42337F87.2010802@jefferyfernandez.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-ID: <200503130212.53764.johannes@php.net> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [patch] highlight_[file|string] and line numbers From: johannes@php.net (Johannes Schlueter) Hi Jeffery, On Sunday 13 March 2005 00:47, Jeffery Fernandez wrote: > That looks very good but there seems to be serious html issues when I > validated that page... Total 1789 erros when I validated that page at > w3c. If you can fix that it would be awesome. Try to validate it as XHTML1.0 and, since the function is for embedding into other documents, keep in mind that the output is missing the doctype header and tag and so on, it's only the

... part. johannes