Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:15254 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 7800 invoked by uid 1010); 4 Mar 2005 15:35:33 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 7759 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2005 15:35:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pb1.pair.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Mar 2005 15:35:33 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.204.192.51 jdi.jdimedia.nl Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([212.204.192.51:39058] helo=jdi.jdimedia.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity HEAD r(5124)) with SMTP id 22/29-29225-44088224 for ; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 10:35:32 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdimedia.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j24FZTd0018525 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:35:29 +0100 Received: from jdi.jdimedia.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (jdi.jdimedia.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 16651-06-3 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:35:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdimedia.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j24FZMD7018491; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:35:23 +0100 Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:35:22 +0100 (CET) X-X-Sender: derick@localhost To: Christian Schneider cc: Matthew Charles Kavanagh , PHP Developers Mailing List In-Reply-To: <42285403.9030308@cschneid.com> Message-ID: References: <2fd662a0050304021017e3a43c@mail.gmail.com> <42284BED.1090003@teh.ath.cx> <42284EF8.7040804@teh.ath.cx> <42285403.9030308@cschneid.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at jdimedia.nl Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Encryption Routines and PHP 5.1+ From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Christian Schneider wrote: > I'm sure if there's a major uproar about an extension being mandatory > for the next killer application then they'll reconsider. But for now it > seems that encryption functionality a la mcrypt hasn't been in high > enough demand. Even if it was, I would be against bundling libraries. There are plenty of reasons which I'm not going to rehash now (search the archives). regards, Derick