Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:15253 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 88877 invoked by uid 1010); 4 Mar 2005 15:20:21 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 88862 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2005 15:20:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO teh.ath.cx) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Mar 2005 15:20:21 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.250.162.16 smtpout16.mailhost.ntl.com Solaris 8 (1) Received: from ([212.250.162.16:46824] helo=mta08-winn.mailhost.ntl.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity HEAD r(5124)) with SMTP id BC/A7-29225-4BC78224 for ; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 10:20:21 -0500 Received: from aamta08-winn.mailhost.ntl.com ([212.250.162.8]) by mta08-winn.mailhost.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20050304152018.TYVM8887.mta08-winn.mailhost.ntl.com@aamta08-winn.mailhost.ntl.com> for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:20:18 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.101] (really [81.96.210.130]) by aamta08-winn.mailhost.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20050304152018.WRNE1844.aamta08-winn.mailhost.ntl.com@[192.168.1.101]> for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:20:18 +0000 Message-ID: <42287CB4.9050308@teh.ath.cx> Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:20:20 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050111) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP Developers Mailing List References: <2fd662a0050304021017e3a43c@mail.gmail.com> <42284BED.1090003@teh.ath.cx> <42284EF8.7040804@teh.ath.cx> <42285403.9030308@cschneid.com> In-Reply-To: <42285403.9030308@cschneid.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Encryption Routines and PHP 5.1+ From: matthew@teh.ath.cx (Matthew Charles Kavanagh) Christian Schneider wrote: > Matthew Charles Kavanagh wrote: > >> Perhaps you're not seeing my point, or perhaps you don't care about >> users? I speak as a developer, not as some guy with a crap webhost, and > > > So according to you every single extension should be put bundled and > installed by default? > If not, then someone has to draw the line and decide which ones are > treated as "first class" and that's exactly what people (e.g. Derick) > are doing here: They decided against bundling libmcrypt. > > I'm sure if there's a major uproar about an extension being mandatory > for the next killer application then they'll reconsider. But for now it > seems that encryption functionality a la mcrypt hasn't been in high > enough demand. > > - Chris > I'd think that this thread is a discussion about whether people actually want mcrypt, and I think I have indicated my position :)