Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:15163 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 29780 invoked by uid 1010); 23 Feb 2005 06:44:40 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 29764 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2005 06:44:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pb1.pair.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Feb 2005 06:44:39 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 69.64.38.41 bluga.net Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([69.64.38.41:33180] helo=bluga.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity HEAD r(5097)) with SMTP id 42/09-08154-7562C124 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 01:44:39 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by bluga.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1801921C9C0; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:41:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from bluga.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bluga.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21957-10; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:41:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from [192.168.0.102] (66-65-39-8.nyc.rr.com [66.65.39.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bluga.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9840921C9BF; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:41:25 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <421C2648.7090809@php.net> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 01:44:24 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lukas Smith Cc: Marcus Boerger , internals@lists.php.net References: <59089102.20050217201853@marcus-boerger.de> <421BB833.40509@php.net> In-Reply-To: <421BB833.40509@php.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at bluga.net Subject: Re: Before March 1st aka PHP 5.1 beta From: cellog@php.net (Greg Beaver) Lukas Smith wrote: > Marcus Boerger wrote: > >> Hello internals, >> >> before we rush into another version, how about clearing some open >> issues >> that were explicitly relayed from 5.0 to 5.1. > > > I would like to highlight again that getting the pear installer version > 1.4 will also be important. getting this into php 5.1 will improve the > life for pecl considerably! > > Greg has been working really hard on getting this stuff far along and > now we need testers just like PDO to get this stuff stable. Especially > with Wez being very busy with PDO its important that other people form > internals step up to ensure that all the new features for PECL work well > in the real world. I plan to release PEAR 1.4.0a1 this week. Although this version should not be included in PHP 5.1 beta 1, I expect that barring any disasters, the first beta should be ready by PHP 5.1 beta 2. In the mean time, the release of a1 will give me a chance to fine-tune the install-pear.php script and other factors that go into the release process. What makes more sense: sticking with PEAR 1.3.5 for PHP 5.1 stable, or trying to get PEAR 1.4.0 stable into PHP 5.1 stable? If 5.1 stable is planned for no sooner than May/June, this is no problem. Earlier than that might be pushing it, but who knows, the current release is very stable, it is only alpha because features may need to change after users have a chance to try them out. Greg