Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:15080 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 34002 invoked by uid 1010); 17 Feb 2005 22:58:11 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 33919 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2005 22:58:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Feb 2005 22:58:08 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.161.72.28 theta.altoona-pa.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([209.161.72.28:39828] helo=theta.altoona-pa.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 1.2 (r4437)) with SMTP id 89/88-28819-87125124 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:58:00 -0500 Received: from JASONGARBER2 (static-207-68-114-163.alt.east.verizon.net [207.68.114.163]) by theta.altoona-pa.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B11C16E0B; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:57:57 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:55:53 -0500 X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0) Professional Reply-To: Jason Garber Organization: IonZoft, Inc. X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <423598874.20050217175553@ionzoft.com> To: "Ron Korving" Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <20050217224614.21062.qmail@lists.php.net> References: <59089102.20050217201853@marcus-boerger.de><20050217221101.74963.qmail@lists.php.net> <1334163369.20050217233233@marcus-boerger.de> <20050217224614.21062.qmail@lists.php.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Before March 1st aka PHP 5.1 beta From: jason@ionzoft.com (Jason Garber) Hello, Speaking of these matters, how about implementing functions within interfaces? -- Best regards, Jason mailto:jason@ionzoft.com Thursday, February 17, 2005, 5:46:08 PM, you wrote: RK> Okay, I'll accept the "no" of course, but I am curious.. Is it an RK> implementation problem with the current engine? Saying that using interfaces RK> discards the MI issue is nonsense imho, because I can't implement any RK> functions in an interface. RK> So why is this such a big "no"? Implementation problem or is it against a RK> certain PHP philosophy? RK> Ron RK> "Marcus Boerger" wrote in message RK> news:1334163369.20050217233233@marcus-boerger.de... >> Hello Ron, >> >> Thursday, February 17, 2005, 11:10:55 PM, you wrote: >> >> > A little offtopic, but I'm still curious.. is multiple inheritence RK> something >> > we might see appearing in 5.2 ? >> >> Definitively not. >> You may raise this question prior to PHP 6, >> However still getting the answer 'no'. >> The concept simply doesn't match with PHP >> and since we have multiple inheritance for >> interfaces that's enough. >> >> Best regards, >> Marcus mailto:helly@php.net