Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:15053 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 31978 invoked by uid 1010); 17 Feb 2005 19:23:33 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 31945 invoked from network); 17 Feb 2005 19:23:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Feb 2005 19:23:32 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 66.198.51.121 lerdorf.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([66.198.51.121:59606] helo=colo.lerdorf.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 1.2 (r4437)) with SMTP id 91/E8-33104-33FE4124 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:23:32 -0500 Received: from [207.126.233.18] (rasmus2.corp.yahoo.com [207.126.233.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by colo.lerdorf.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j1HJNRUL031911 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:23:28 -0800 Message-ID: <4214EF30.60703@lerdorf.com> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:23:28 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20050217) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marcus Boerger CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <59089102.20050217201853@marcus-boerger.de> In-Reply-To: <59089102.20050217201853@marcus-boerger.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Before March 1st aka PHP 5.1 beta From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus Lerdorf) Marcus Boerger wrote: > 4) php 5.1 is aiming to increase performance and security => ifsetor > > It is nice and easy and fast...only it's name. Well guys come on that's > the stupiest reason to reject. The name is selfspeaking, you're all only > not so used to its name as you are with foreach for now. I think ifsetor is a useful shortcut for something people do a lot. > 5) did we came to a conclusion on Rasmus' input filtering yet > > Since we said we aim to increase security with 5.1 we should incorporate > that idea/technique in some way. I don't think I am going to have it ready that fast. I'll commit something to pecl soon but I am tied up with some really annoying time-wasting stuff right now. -Rasmus