Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:14979 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 29303 invoked by uid 1010); 15 Feb 2005 18:22:28 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 29274 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2005 18:22:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Feb 2005 18:22:27 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.233.170.199 rproxy.gmail.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([64.233.170.199:60461] helo=rproxy.gmail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 1.2 (r4437)) with SMTP id 87/C3-55914-2ED32124 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:22:27 -0500 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id c51so812487rne for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:22:20 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=ZRHbwJdIgI/sv1KRc3o2QosPc42TwKGqGwwRPqJHZ0oDC7+UJsRBGPKe9+kueb2ikwRc+U1bHsvF/iGc1DOgewKpcPCoCl2NkcB2JB5rFDnkNe09uab2WVSlDvt71PWPiHNY31Wxu4o2S0HFE31ABdeo7DnHr9f8t05aHV2ELFU= Received: by 10.38.150.72 with SMTP id x72mr197391rnd; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:22:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.65.30 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:22:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:22:19 -0500 Reply-To: Dan Scott To: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <42120078.4050505@ctindustries.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <420ED226.3090702@bitflux.ch> <420F8D1F.4010402@bitflux.ch> <5.1.0.14.2.20050214162726.03794bd0@localhost> <20050215010122.39406.qmail@lists.php.net> <4e89b42605021417374ce885e1@mail.gmail.com> <4211ABDC.9070202@bitflux.ch> <42120078.4050505@ctindustries.net> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Anyone against requiring libxml2 2.6.x for PHP From: denials@gmail.com (Dan Scott) On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:00:24 -0500, Rob Richards wrote: > And for RHEL customers. They can always grab the rpms from xmlsoft. I > would assume - but not guarantee :) - the rpms are built against that > since Daniel is an employee of RedHat. RHEL 4 (released today) ships libxml2 2.6.16, so not all RHEL customers would need the xmlsoft RPMs :) Dan