Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:14775 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 96251 invoked by uid 1010); 9 Feb 2005 21:02:02 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 96236 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2005 21:02:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Feb 2005 21:02:02 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 194.109.193.120 unknown Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([194.109.193.120:53200] helo=mx1.moulin.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity HEAD (r4105:4106)) with SMTP id D0/8A-30278-94A7A024 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 16:02:02 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.moulin.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1161FBA13E for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:02:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from mx1.moulin.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (moulin [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03610-03 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:02:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.moulin.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15CF4BA13B for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 22:02:01 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <420A7A42.10102@iamjochem.com> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 22:01:54 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: php internals References: <20050209203810.59785.qmail@lists.php.net> <420A7781.50504@iamjochem.com> <420A7850.8020000@php.net> In-Reply-To: <420A7850.8020000@php.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at moulin.nl Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] timeoffset per process From: jochem@iamjochem.com (Jochem Maas) Lukas Smith wrote: > Jochem Maas wrote: > ... >> >> maybe install a test setup on your local machine? >> then you can mess with the local time, no problems? > > > this is what I do now, but obviously its far from ideal, especially > since you also want to be able to run your tests on your production > server to check if the install went fine or when bugs are reported. yeah, sorry wrong list. I thought I was answering on generals :-/ my apologies. (should have recognized the name.) > > regards, > Lukas