Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:14761 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 5783 invoked by uid 1010); 9 Feb 2005 17:11:39 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 5754 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2005 17:11:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Feb 2005 17:11:39 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 193.113.154.28 dswu27.btconnect.com Solaris 8 (1) Received: from ([193.113.154.28:59429] helo=dswu27.btconnect.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity HEAD (r4105:4106)) with SMTP id 51/F1-24923-A444A024 for ; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 12:11:38 -0500 Received: from [10.0.0.9] (actually host 136.11.138.81.in-addr.arpa) by dswu27.btconnect.com with SMTP-CUST (XT-PP) with ESMTP; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 17:11:32 +0000 Message-ID: <420A4557.7060509@lsces.co.uk> Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 17:16:07 +0000 Organization: L.S.Caine Electronic Services User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <4e89b42605020821554c1ba198@mail.gmail.com> <20050209083714.12464.qmail@lists.php.net> <4e89b42605020907043c839b71@mail.gmail.com> <20050209162402.13541.qmail@lists.php.net> <4e89b42605020908416598396f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4e89b42605020908416598396f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PECL-DEV] Re: Announce: PDO beta releases From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) Wez Furlong wrote: > Please read the various links that I posted in the announcement; they > explain a number of design goals about PDO (particularly the OTN > article) that will answer your questions in more detail. Not into Oracle ;) , but it answers the main questions. PDO is not planned to be a replacement for ADOdb. > No. That is something for another layer. PDO is intended to be a > very light layer with minimal interference. Until all engines can use the same SQL there is little point in a generic layer that means you have to re-engineer the queries when ever you switch engines ? Unless it is very much faster than the existing drivers, in which case I'd switch the Firebird ADOdb driver to use it :) So I'm looking at a different level of the Abstraction Model. It's bad enough catering for the differences AFTER ADOdb has taken off the rough spots ;) -- Lester Caine ----------------------------- L.S.Caine Electronic Services