Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:14647 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 38748 invoked by uid 1010); 4 Feb 2005 21:51:41 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 38728 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2005 21:51:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Feb 2005 21:51:41 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.233.184.204 wproxy.gmail.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([64.233.184.204:45016] helo=wproxy.gmail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity HEAD (r4105:4106)) with SMTP id 4B/32-01701-D6EE3024 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 16:51:41 -0500 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 49so253347wri for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 13:51:39 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=fskBmxM3XIAcGHanSxzSDkAWQTKqy51OsHgfS8hNtzLJATz8HdzxPCgO23T40Es44MNLVSsvm57e1Zb0EKnL5AoHocAv1zFLteW+XmqXDU72az50AKG8Bd5ntnNOe3Q2msN/6UFbINCaIRdEpUGbBNCm6DY5FmAOw1/8UVImUdo= Received: by 10.54.19.29 with SMTP id 29mr289944wrs; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 13:51:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.59.22 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:51:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4e89b42605020413515e6448e6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 16:51:38 -0500 Reply-To: Wez Furlong To: Andrei Zmievski Cc: Derrell.Lipman@unwireduniverse.com, internals In-Reply-To: <20050204213948.GA38807@gravitonic.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <4e89b426050203173642c9c28b@mail.gmail.com> <20050204213948.GA38807@gravitonic.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] how to make nasty code less nasty (obtaining sqlite db handle) From: kingwez@gmail.com (Wez Furlong) The extension deps framework (that orders the initialization done in internal_functions.c) is already in HEAD; I was talking about the extension "interfaces" idea I proposed a fairly long time ago now (long enough that I can't remember how long ago). I remember you showing interest in that at that time. --Wez. > I'd definitely be interested in seeing the extension dependency > framework in 5.2. > > - Andrei >