Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:14638 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 20152 invoked by uid 1010); 4 Feb 2005 07:32:41 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 20137 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2005 07:32:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Feb 2005 07:32:41 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.239.127.2 unknown Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from ([80.239.127.2:3194] helo=utvikling.adstate.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity HEAD (r4105:4106)) with SMTP id 5A/B0-19949-81523024 for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 02:32:41 -0500 Message-ID: <040301c50a8b$ac97ab40$a900000a@adstate.local> To: References: <5.1.0.14.2.20050201111730.0299da70@localhost> <20050203122955.292e6da9@localhost.localdomain> <02da01c50a13$93728720$a900000a@adstate.local> <20050203195911.512edfd9@localhost.localdomain> <051501c50a49$40328430$0300000a@pc> Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 08:32:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [Operators overloading] PHP 5.1 From: tslettebo@broadpark.no (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Terje_Sletteb=F8?=) >From: "Darrell Brogdon" >I don't think its really a resentment (for the most part) against OO in >PHP even if it seems that way. One of the stated goals of PHP is to >have a low learning curve and this is something it does very well. I'm >sure you can agree that OO concepts typically don't fit that criteria >which is why you can still build complete PHP apps without using any OO >concepts. Yes, the gentle learning curve of PHP, and that you don't have to use OO is a good thing. >So the seemingly resentful attitudes should probably be >viewed as one of "lets do our best to keep this as simple as possible >while retaining the power it is intended to provide". Ok. Regards, Terje