Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:14601 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 97171 invoked by uid 1010); 3 Feb 2005 22:35:26 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 97148 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2005 22:35:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Feb 2005 22:35:26 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.237.132.12 wp005.webpack.hosteurope.de Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from ([80.237.132.12:46682] helo=wp005.webpack.hosteurope.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity HEAD (r4105:4106)) with SMTP id 35/1B-10528-D27A2024 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 17:35:25 -0500 Message-ID: <35.1B.10528.D27A2024@pb1.pair.com> Received: by wp005.webpack.hosteurope.de running Exim 4.43 using esmtpa from dsl-082-083-199-022.arcor-ip.net ([82.83.199.22] helo=WOMBERT) id 1CwpZK-0004Sv-RU; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 23:35:22 +0100 To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?'Terje_Sletteb=F8'?= , Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 23:37:17 +0100 Organization: bitXtender GbR MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <049d01c50a3e$27c59f00$0300000a@pc> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcUKPeApCou9jqO/TwiL0bmEsyS/1wAAt9xw Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1 From: dz@bitxtender.com (=?iso-8859-1?Q?David_Z=FClke?=) References: <049d01c50a3e$27c59f00$0300000a@pc> No offense, but before even thinking about operator overloading support, really useful and crucial stuff like namespaces or Unicode support = should be tackled first. David > -----Original Message----- > From: Terje Sletteb=F8 [mailto:tslettebo@broadpark.no] > Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 11:18 PM > To: internals@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1 >=20 > >From: "Jani Taskinen" >=20 > > On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Terje Sletteb=F8 wrote: > > > > > Why would it be ok there, but not in PHP? It also exists in other > scripting > > > languages, such as Python and Perl. > > > > PHP is not Perl or Python or . >=20 > That's not an argument against operator overloading. The question is = why > would it not be appropriate for PHP? Dynamic typing has been = mentioned, > and > when I said that it exists in other dynamically typed languages, as = well, > I > get the reply that "PHP is not language xxx". What kind of reply is = that?! > Ilia Alshanetsky suggested in a posting that the PHP community in = general > might not be ready for its safe introduction (i.e. they would = typically > misuse it). I hope it's not the case; after all, it's not such an > "advanced" > feature, when several mainstream languages has it. >=20 > Regards, >=20 > Terje >=20 > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >=20