Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:14547 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 59710 invoked by uid 1010); 2 Feb 2005 23:44:50 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 59695 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2005 23:44:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Feb 2005 23:44:50 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 80.74.107.235 mail.zend.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([80.74.107.235:58039] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity HEAD (r4105:4106)) with SMTP id 0F/D3-30841-EE561024 for ; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:44:49 -0500 Received: (qmail 19541 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2005 23:44:40 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO andi-notebook.zend.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Feb 2005 23:44:40 -0000 Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20050202154150.03d2c0c0@localhost> X-Sender: andi@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 15:44:35 -0800 To: Marcus Boerger Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <592609621.20050202222615@marcus-boerger.de> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20050201111730.0299da70@localhost> <5.1.0.14.2.20050201111730.0299da70@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.1 From: andi@zend.com (Andi Gutmans) At 10:26 PM 2/2/2005 +0100, Marcus Boerger wrote: >Hello Andi, > >Tuesday, February 1, 2005, 8:26:15 PM, you wrote: > > > Hey, > > > I just heard from Wez that PDO is in very advanced stages now (ready > for beta). > > I would like to start the PHP 5.1 release process. Due to the lack of > > testing both the new engine VM and PDO have received I would like to start > > with a beta process so that we get feedback. > >I hope i can do my outstanding PDO work during the next few weeks so >the time frame is ok for me too. Great. >However i'd like to see the 'ifsetor' or '?:' operator since it makes >many things much faster and easier to read. I am not sure if the security filter functions aren't enough because they will be used to gather and verify input which is the main purpose of ifsetor. Also, we never found a great implementation but that's another story :) >Last but not least i have some forach-engine cleanup lingering around >which i will commit in the next days. OK just don't break anything :) Andi