Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:14317 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 22692 invoked by uid 1010); 8 Jan 2005 20:59:21 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 22672 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2005 20:59:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Jan 2005 20:59:21 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 207.44.144.89 utopia.rusko.us Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from ([207.44.144.89:43050] helo=utopia.rusko.us) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity HEAD (r4059)) with SMTP id 65/F5-47049-8A940E14 for ; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:59:20 -0500 Received: from rusko (ool-44c0a1af.dyn.optonline.net [68.192.161.175]) by utopia.rusko.us (Sendmail) with SMTP id F0367BBBC8 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:06:05 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <066401c4f5c4$645bf600$0200a8c0@rusko> To: References: <20041228115825.GA25679@h2g2.staff.proxad.net> <65df911e0412280813503bc5cb@mail.gmail.com> <20050107095751.GA2238@h2g2.staff.proxad.net> Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 15:55:31 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Patch to PHP mail() function From: paul@rusko.us ("Paul G") ----- Original Message ----- From: "Olivier Beyssac" To: Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 4:57 AM Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Patch to PHP mail() function > On Tue, Dec 28, 2004, Olivier Beyssac wrote: > > Please find attached a small patch to the PHP mail() function. > > I'm sorry but I would like to know if I did something wrong with > this patch submission? Please let me know if I submitted it to a > wrong address or in a wrong format. while i can't speak for why noone has replied to your mail, please search the list archives for the discussion of my equivalent patch submission a few months back. in short, it was rejected and while i might disagree with that (the arguments against were wrong and a derivative patch is now being used in production on a lot of shared servers running cpanel), there appears to be no chance of having something like this get accepted. -p