Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:14278
Return-Path: <kingwez@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 14678 invoked by uid 1010); 4 Jan 2005 17:15:45 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 14616 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2005 17:15:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 4 Jan 2005 17:15:45 -0000
X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.233.184.200 wproxy.gmail.com Linux 2.4/2.6
Received: from ([64.233.184.200:34952] helo=wproxy.gmail.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity HEAD (r3992M)) with SMTP
	id D8/FC-06279-14FCAD14 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 12:15:45 -0500
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so368229wri
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 09:15:42 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
	s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
	b=Pu4duIHjA3RB/HBgMpwyg4oAIt7CNrl4eh38bm4mnVZgS/uewajXj9dZ+usDTDYQsdFIoi5L/vWE1FzcyDiAjR9mg5Y7J0kThXeV5TYK7L3oYZHOP1q9FUfY8zWKEYF0bnLk+nHSxdgvY8e/cOvF9lHfi5WrgUeflEYA3YmBfJY=
Received: by 10.54.19.64 with SMTP id 64mr322294wrs;
	Tue, 04 Jan 2005 09:15:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.59.28 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:15:41 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4e89b426050104091555297714@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:15:41 -0500
Reply-To: Wez Furlong <kingwez@gmail.com>
To: Gareth Ardron <gareth@fission.org.uk>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <41DAAFCC.8020905@fission.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <41DA068A.9080009@fission.org.uk>
	<5c2874720501040342d92196d@mail.gmail.com>
	<41DAAFCC.8020905@fission.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] bit of an odd bug
From: kingwez@gmail.com (Wez Furlong)

If you want to do this kind of thing, why not do it properly?

$foo = new $scanning_class;
$foo->scanBuffer($input);

that is, after all, what "extends" is all about.

--Wez


On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 15:01:32 +0000, Gareth Ardron <gareth@fission.org.uk> wrote:
> Jason Sweat wrote:
> 
> >Hi Gareth,
> >
> >In addition to the other options people have mentioned, you could also
> >use the old standby of:
> >eval("\$result = $scanning_class::scanBuffer(\$input);");
> >
> >
> Cheers for all the replies, people. I may have a bit of a prod at the
> internals this evening though, as this is a bloody annoying thing when
> you're trying to build up a highly modularised system - and I'd like the
> code as clean as possible really, not jumping through hoops like use
> reflection API to do this as it has to be maintained by people who
> haven't yet encountered that type of thing.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> --
> Gareth Ardron
> 
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> 
>